Why join Definitive-Socionics.Info?
- For remarkable content integration. It doesn't matter what kind of content you contribute it will all get highly integrated together. For example, you create a new article, blog post or glossary definition and it will automatically get linked to a dedicated discussion in the forum. There can be little or no mistakes because the admin and moderators can move/rename/tidy-up etc. content-pages/forum-posts where deemed necessary;
- For monetization possibilities. Any content can be affiliated to relevant products and services providing the code you need to embed is currently supported by the platform. This removes "the non-profit dilemma" as expressed in the case studies below;
- For more collaboration and less bickering over who's "right"?;
- To embrace Web 2.0 philosophy and combine many different web services and methods to aid and assist in how we learn about the world through "socionic eyes";
- To market the Socionics framework and the various unexplored potential off-shoots for new products and services that solve real-world problems;
- To become guru's of Socionics so we can create new opportunities for ourselves and others in the world of value-exchange (business);
- To increase your on-line presence and gain credibility for your ideas — new and refined;
Case Study #1: Wikidot vs. Wordpress
Wordpress.com (and most other FREE blogging platforms like Blogger, Typepad etc.) represent to me "the non-profit dilemma". In other words, when will all that public thought recording and journaling make any difference to one's self and others financially? Likely not at all currently.
Case Study #2: Wikidot vs. phpBB
phpBB is the most widely used Open Source forum solution. Again "the non-profit dilemma" ensues. After hundreds of thousands of forum posts who actually benefits apart from those "militant members" who gain a sense of pride with their online presence.
Case Study #3: Wikidot vs. MediaWiki
MediaWiki is a web-based wiki software application used by the grand-daddy wiki of them all — Wikipedia.org as well as many others. Yet again "the non-profit dilemma" ensues. Inevitably it seems that contributors want and need compensation for their efforts else content generation suffers.




