1. For remarkable content integration. It doesn't matter what kind of content you contribute it will all get highly integrated together. For example, you create a new article, blog post or glossary definition and it will automatically get linked to a dedicated discussion in the forum. There can be little or no mistakes because the admin and moderators can move/rename/tidy-up etc. content-pages/forum-posts where deemed necessary;
2. For monetization possibilities. Any content can be affiliated to relevant products and services providing the code you need to embed is currently supported by the platform. This removes "the non-profit dilemma" as expressed in the case studies below;
3. For more collaboration and less bickering over who's "right"?;
4. To embrace Web 2.0 philosophy and combine many different web services and methods to aid and assist in how we learn about the world through "socionic eyes";
5. To market the Socionics framework and the various unexplored potential off-shoots for new products and services that solve real-world problems;
6. To become guru's of Socionics so we can create new opportunities for ourselves and others in the world of value-exchange (business);
7. To increase your on-line presence and gain credibility for your ideas — new and refined;

In my last opinion it was basically "the 80/20 rule". In other words, 80% content produced by the website creators, designers and developers with 20% content (if we were lucky enough!) coming from the visitors.

What is this "web 2.0" philosophy?

In my current view its basically "the 20/80 rule". In other words, 20% content produced by "a guy or small group of guys" who startup a website leaving 80% of the remaining content to get freely published by visitors with little or no restrictions that the original authors had.

So who "owns" the site?

In essence — nobody does although somebody had to take charge to get the thing up and running.

The Admin (WhiteKnight82) is simply the founder of a new community network.

In the mean time *anyone* who joins the site is as free as the Admin to create/edit pages and write articles for fun and (potential) profit (with affiliate links such as the one's i've embedded in the edutainment section.

Closing thoughts

"Web 2.0" therefore is the "new race" to use the internet as a viable business platform for *anyone* willing to exploit it in a way that benefits self and others.

A bit of a silly issue since it only affects the start page as far as I can tell. Everything else appears fine as it was meant to be. I shall have to tweak the start page then although its not really a priority at the moment.

"sue-pur-la-tives"

highest in degree of comparison: expressing the highest degree of grammatical comparison of an adjective or adverb — MSN Encarta

The general rule of thumb is to amend an adverb with "-ist" or "-ing" or to add a quantifier like "most" or "least" and so on and so forth.

Examples:

The superlative form of: "great" is "greatest" ; "small" is "smallest" ; "light" is "lightest" ; etc.

Also valid are short superlative statements such as: "most rewarding"; "least knowledgeable" ; "most sociable" ; etc.

Of course its all fun and games though the next question once a superlative statement has been made is to ask one's self, "by what standard(s)?". Thus heating up the debate surrounding the superlative proclamation made.

Why might this be a useful exercise?

I believe that by identifying extremes of excellence so to speak I can then look at the "big picture" at a glance with a view to then seeing myself as "incomplete" in areas that I can choose to work on.

Superlatives + Socionics = "A basis for personal growth"

(subject to change as and when)

This "web 2.0" wiki allows you, the reader, to contribute as much or as little as you like with no-fixed commitments. To illustrate this idea I embed an edu-taining video for your learning pleasure:

The point of this post

To illustrate how participating in the forum has as much "freedom" as one has to edit and create pages. I, the admin, don't care too much what gets written in the forum as long as its somewhat relevant to Socionics (where stated).

Unlike a forum platform like phpBB this forum allows anyone, not just the admin, to embed affiliate links should you wish to do some article marketing. In fact you can embed anything that wikidot supports, refer to [http://www.wikidot.com/doc:embedding].